Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.graphics,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: A good free EXIF removal software for Mac OS X?
Date: 29 Aug 2015 15:54:30 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <d4e2tmFt5ceU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <0uKdnUKKj4iRCX3InZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <mrq4l2$5mu$2@dont-email.me> <DeOdnRDsuNnpCn3InZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082811294174414-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <KdSdne9PJO3TMH3InZ2dnUU7-bWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082812055559608-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <d4c49kFepkpU1@mid.individual.net> <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <mrr7sv$lv1$2@dont-email.me> <2015082821043955830-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <d4d2t9FlaggU1@mid.individual.net> <Z62dnb9l4eEkWHzInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Trace: individual.net C/iiGNSTyDRbqIjHpEpMGgFkOFvR2JwG10wHvLQVEoFh8YtFdv
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9sLUTRJImKTKHedKXOVNKm9mBaU=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:31411 comp.sys.mac.graphics:99 comp.sys.mac.system:79116

On 2015-08-29, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote:
> On 2015-08-29 02:48, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2015-08-29, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>> On 2015-08-29 03:13:13 +0000, Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> said:
>>>> In article <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>>>>   Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-08-28 22:05:40 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:
>>>>>> On 2015-08-28, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aah! So you are using stolen equipment.
>>>>>>> I can understand your reluctance to reveal that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last I checked the desire for privacy isn't an indication of
>>>>>> malfeasance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ant is naturally paranoid, I am naturally skeptical and suspicious, it
>>>>> was part of my job description.
>>>>
>>>> I note your use of the past tense. You have my condolences for your
>>>> former affliction, and my hopes for a rapid recovery.
>>>
>>> After 25 years, in a California Law enforcement agency...
>>
>> The fact that you worked in American law enforcement certainly explains
>> your willingness to accuse otherwise innocent people of wrongdoing. You
>> have zero evidence that Ant has stolen anything at all, yet you accuse
>> him of being a thief. You do this because you can get away with it, and
>> it wouldn't surprise me if you've done so on the job, where you had even
>> more power at your fingertips. Again, the desire for privacy isn't an
>> indication of malfeasance. There is absolutely nothing wrong with
>> American citizens removing their own private information from EXIF
>> entries in images. You are a shining example of what is wrong with the
>> mindset of American police forces. Personally I'm glad you are retired.
>> Good riddance.
>
> A bit harsh JR.  Savageduck's statement was kneejerk and not though out. 
>   But that's all.  It happens in NG's from time to time.  Recall the 
> great mindless May of 2003.  Hope that never happens again.

Hardly. Police forces across the country killing innocent American
citizens in record numbers due to the very same mind set and associated
knee jerk reactions is harsh.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR