Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Rich Gray Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: H&R Block At Home 2010 still wants to run in Admin account - (How's TurboTax this year?) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:13:55 -0500 Organization: dis Lines: 21 Message-ID: <8tvs64FtrvU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net iH+NlqX7J3gnwLUskUP0iQdnh+nZZ1VO6qvYYjX61zq4fkajcB Cancel-Lock: sha1:FgmBapvUsqkScz6pN3rzcIea7Ic= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0b11) Gecko/20110209 Firefox/ SeaMonkey/2.1b2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.mac.apps:602 Got around to installing H&R Block's At Home 2010 (the application formerly known as TaxCut) and found that it is still stupid, after all these years. Yep it still expects to be run from an account with administrator rights. Trying to update from the standard user account we do family finances from failed due to lack of privileges. Had to log in as Admin to update and install the state software. Doing day to day applications running in an administrator account is something I've always viewed as a Stupid Windows Trick. I'm astonished that there are major applications such as At Home (TaxCut) still aren't privilege aware and capable of doing the necessary privilege escalation (prompt for admin id & password.) It is possible to switch out of the regular user account, do the updates and come back, but why does an app. that deals with such sensitive information encourage the insecure behavior of running as an admin? In years past, we've used Intuit's TurboTax. It too wanted to run as an administrator. Is that still case this year? (1000 quatloos says yes.)