Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

8088 articles (numbers 462 – 8588) — threaded view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date [desc]
[Spam] Re: NAOMI TALKS: USB Stick Encryption Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202603.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> 2026-03-14 00:43 +0100
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-08 20:17 -0600
Re: Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) 2025-12-08 20:31 -0500
Re: Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) 2025-12-08 20:20 -0500
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-12-07 00:06 -0500
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 22:38 -0600
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 22:35 -0600
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 22:34 -0600
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 14:20 +0800
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 14:17 +0800
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-12-05 22:44 -0600
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-12-05 19:12 -0500
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) 2025-12-06 05:49 +1000
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-05 12:57 -0600
Re: �Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory � 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible� Same Guy <was@another.address> 2025-12-04 08:01 -0800
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-12-04 19:57 +0800
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> 2025-12-04 19:46 +0800
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-29 04:24 -0500
Re: �Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory � 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible� VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-11-29 02:18 -0600
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 21:32 -0500
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 21:05 -0500
Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) 2025-11-29 07:37 +1000
Re: �Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory � 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-11-28 13:37 -0600
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-11-28 12:24 -0600
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-11-28 11:31 -0600
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-11-29 00:18 +0800
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 11:16 -0500
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 23:55 +0800
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 10:51 -0500
Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 19:45 +0800
“Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 02:56 -0600
Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-12 19:40 -0500
Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-11-12 16:08 -0600
Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-12 05:06 -0500
“Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-11-11 21:51 -0600
Re: �Are Hard Drives Getting Better? Let�s Revisit the Bathtub Curve� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-10-20 23:31 -0500
“Are Hard Drives Getting Better? Let’s Revisit the Bathtub Curve” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-10-16 23:01 -0500
Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> 2025-09-01 19:30 +1000
No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD Social Media Retards <retrards@tiktok.com> 2025-09-01 11:02 +0200
Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-08-31 17:33 -0400
Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2025-08-31 20:37 +0100
Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-08-31 23:48 +0800
Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-08-31 20:22 +0800
No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD anon <anon@invalid.org> 2025-08-31 04:21 +0000
Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-08-06 05:38 -0400
Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-08-06 12:08 +0800
“Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-08-05 22:21 -0500
"Seagate unveils 30TB HAMR HDDs for the masses — laser-powered IronWolf Pro and Exos drives are now widely available" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-07-22 17:26 -0500
Thecus N4100EVO question Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> 2025-06-26 22:15 +0200
Re: �Petabyte-Class E2 SSDs Poised to Disrupt Warm Data Storage� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-06-04 23:39 -0500

1 2 3 ... 162 Next »

csiph-web