Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg > #6464
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg |
| Subject | Re: GeForce Now: 100 hours is more than enough for everyone. |
| Date | 2025-12-24 14:30 +0000 |
| Organization | the-candyden-of-code |
| Message-ID | <slrn10knu1i.3fl4n.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <voclkkd2nho2udfi69hh0n50gs19uci1qs@4ax.com> |
Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 15:37 this Tuesday (GMT): > > See? This is why I don't like subscription services. > > Nvidia's GeForce now is cracking down on how long you can play games; > starting January, they're putting a 100hour per month cap on their > service. Want more than that? You're going to have pay ($6USD for an > extra 15 hours).* > > Now, this sort of limitation is acceptable for their free-user tier... > but if I'm paying for the service (Nvidia's 'premium' services range > from $10 to $20 per month, depending on the level of service you > choose; the difference is mostly in the quality of the stream) then I > expect to be able to play as long as I fucking want. > > This is the sort of enshittification that you expect from services > AFTER they dominate the market. Subscription cloud-gaming services are > still only a small part of the gaming industry. At this point, they > should be offering BETTER service than their offline competitors. > > Ultimately, we can expect this sort of abuse from /all/ subscription > services, but I guess Nvidia wants to be ahead of the curve (or maybe > they're trying to scare away all their gaming customers so they can > reuse all those Nvidia GPUs to sell to the AI tech-bros). > > Fortunately, this doesn't really affect me; although I have a GeForce > Now account (and sometimes even use it!), I only have the free > version, and my usage is minimal. It's just a quick way for me to look > at a game to see if its something I'd actually be interested in before > taking the time to download and install it. If I've used a hundred > hours on the service total (in at least five years), I'd be surprised. > > But I'd be pissed off if I were actually paying for the service and > using it as intended. And disgusted, because this is what the industry > will eventually devolve into, once subscription services become the > norm. > > > > > > > ---- > * story > https://www.pcgamesn.com/nvidia/geforce-now-100-hour-cap-2026 So it's now also using the data billing system, fantastic. I can't wait for them to start selling "unlimited" packages that severely limit you after an amount of time. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
GeForce Now: 100 hours is more than enough for everyone. Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-23 10:37 -0500 Re: GeForce Now: 100 hours is more than enough for everyone. candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-24 14:30 +0000
csiph-web