Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,comp.sys.dec,vmsnet.pdp-11 Subject: Re: Y3K for PDP-11 Operating Systems Message-ID: Date: 31 May 2011 15:54:17 -0500 References: <982e99c70332e762155dff3bb558fd4b@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> Organization: Encompasserve Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.53.90.116 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=f]4l`g2MBaQPF49IdUYT?QYSB=nbEKnk[j;0@n>kLbiZT1og]InT X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.dec:552 In article , jjh writes: > > My point is, a lot of the older processor archtectures have close to > or 100% compliant IP cores. There is even one for the Apollo 11 Lunar > Landar flight computer that runs release B of the lander code. > So why struggle with a sw emulation? (aside from the fact that it can > easiliy run on a PC). Exactly. There are a hell of a lot of software folks and end users who can download another piece of software and get it to run, but haven't got the foggiest of how to burn an FPGA, don't have an FPGA burner, and don't want one.