Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.mv.net!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,comp.sys.dec,comp.os.vms Subject: Re: QBUS Prototyping Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <8265dgFs33U3@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1303147603 17734 192.74.137.71 (18 Apr 2011 17:26:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:26:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.dec:231 comp.os.vms:2192 Johnny Billquist writes: >On 2011-04-18 05:56, Bob Koehler wrote: >> In article, Johnny Billquist writes: >>> >>> (Oh, and a VAX is not a PDP... :-) >> >> That's right. No VAX ever implemented the MARK instruction. Now >> can you find a PDP-11 programmer who actually used it? >I used it. >But only to test how to, and then decided "never more". :-) I'm guessing that instruction was developed for some compiler(s) which had some bizarre linkages for subroutines, and very few, if any, assembly language programmers ever used it, beyond trying to figure out what to do with it. (next question, which compiler(s) used it?)