Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:21:42 -0500 |
| Date | Sat, 11 Apr 2015 19:21:41 -0700 |
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.att |
| Subject | Re: New AT&T U-Verse (DSL?) user in L.A.: WEP only? |
| References | <9v-dncYyFZXPOoTInZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@earthlink.com> <mg9q0s$fng$1@cobs.motzarella.org> |
| In-Reply-To | <mg9q0s$fng$1@cobs.motzarella.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Message-ID | <HcKdnVzqwIArS7TInZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 28 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 45.50.15.139 |
| X-Trace | sv3-Ty70kSPg7nLU9z8XVWJA6NrEA7LGFlz+DSXeowlPMh3/nvnuVXDVebVIBb5UTh6a+JoPZ4+g2JIO0EE!v7MmhO4cyWuKyVBX6sCopjk39hjSQHvsenjW2VKCbUSNSYaKyIxB5Qs0broaMmWsS2ERwDIxaL76!UndVzG0ZeUfkp8e62yCX5L+vYnVfuw== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2363 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.att:21 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Isn't comp.sys.att about AT&T's services?
On 4/10/2015 5:31 PM, dhorvath@nosuch.cobs.com (David B. Horvath, CCP)
wrote:
> I think you posted to the wrong group
>
> In article <9v-dncYyFZXPOoTInZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> ant@zimage.comANT says...
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Last night, I was helping a client in L.A. with his new slow Internet
>> connection (only up to 5 Mb/sec download :() that was set up recently. I
>> was helping him with his wireless network issues, but I noticed his
>> yellow paper print out said WEP key/wi-fi password for the supplied
>> modem+router (ATT<number>). Is it really using insecured WEP? Can it use
>> something stronger like WPA2? :(
>>
>> Thank you in advance. :)
--
"When an ant gets wings, it loses its head." --Bosnian Proverb
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
Back to comp.sys.att | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
New AT&T U-Verse (DSL?) user in L.A.: WEP only? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-30 12:43 -0700
Re: New AT&T U-Verse (DSL?) user in L.A.: WEP only? dhorvath@nosuch.cobs.com (David B. Horvath, CCP) - 2015-04-11 00:31 +0000
Re: New AT&T U-Verse (DSL?) user in L.A.: WEP only? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-04-11 19:21 -0700
Re: New AT&T U-Verse (DSL?) user in L.A.: WEP only? Dave McGuire <mcguire@neurotica.com> - 2015-06-25 20:31 -0400
csiph-web