Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Finnigan Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2.programmer Subject: Re: Assembler for Learning Assembly Language Programming ORCA vsMerlin vs =?UTF-8?B?Pz8/?= Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:11:26 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Mac GUI Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <0345a392-b919-4062-bcc6-b5de758387c4@googlegroups.com> <30de082a-f1f7-4d82-9dca-1da776077447@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:11:26 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5cc464cf6d41c2bc4edecc448ca03787"; logging-data="24103"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HcJiVrojHoqeZS0y2OCc0" User-Agent: Mac GUI Usenet Cancel-Lock: sha1:Yz112s7ID3ORyF+1wL2ZnpaTAZ8= In-Reply-To: <30de082a-f1f7-4d82-9dca-1da776077447@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.apple2.programmer:5173 touvell@gmail.com wrote: > > I'm leaning toward the ORCA/M, since I already own it and some of the > other > Byteworks tools, and have used parts of the Byteworks suite in the past. > My impression of ORCA/M is that it really shines when working on a large-scale project. Also, ORCA/M will integrate with the other Byteworks languages. For small to medium-size code bases, Merlin is just fine. -- ]DF$ The New Apple II User's Guide: https://macgui.com/newa2guide/