Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Chatfield Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2.programmer Subject: Re: malloc with cc65 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 10:52:00 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <20231220105200.7f518465@smilodon-gracilis> References: <20231214135300.3f65fe0f@smilodon-gracilis> <20231214215955.353cd4e4@smilodon-gracilis> <20231218005802.24df6e51@smilodon-gracilis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b2880d7e63b2832624c336dc274125a"; logging-data="659386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nCJFEWhSDBJlCxoOj7HbConJxuphsDZU=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:GiOrpKD7+NnWJYcd54we9gUrh2M= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.apple2.programmer:6286 On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 19:51:58 -0000 (UTC) Oliver Schmidt wrote: > No, the syntax above isn't for assigning a value to a pointer. It's > for assigning a value to the address the pointer points to. OMG, it's been too long since I've written C code. Of, course you're right and I knew that. The overloading of the * operator in one place to define a pointer and in another place, the exact opposite, to access the data pointed to by a pointer, has always perplexed me.