Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.apollo > #149
| From | Kurt Nowak <kurt.m.nowak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apollo |
| Subject | Re: Registry question |
| Date | 2012-04-20 10:21 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <27385802.473.1334942462357.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynid15> (permalink) |
| References | <18377764.251.1334856571329.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yntt13> <a2958b27-89da-4d4a-9b44-87ce6fcfd3fd@z38g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> |
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:58:11 PM UTC-7, Jim Rees wrote: > On Apr 19, 1:29 pm, Kurt Nowak <kurt.m.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All- > > > > Is it normal after you delete a person and account that the deleted information remains in the local registry? I added person "peter" and account "peter.staff.none" and then did a synch in edrgy to update the local registry. After that, I deleted those new person and account objects and ran synch again, upon which it complained that the old account is "marked for no login" or something like that....upon doing edrgy -l, I noticed that the old deleted registry objects remained in the local registry with GID and UID both -1. Is this normal?? How can i totally delete these old objects? What does -1 mean?? > > > > The "Administering the Domain/OS registry" manual doesnt say anything about this...perhaps this is a bug?? I would think that synch would delete any local registry objects to match the network registry... > > I can't answer your other questions, but "-1" is "nobody". By > convention, this is the completely unprivileged user, able to do only > those things that are permitted to everyone. This convention lives on > in linux today, although they seem to have changed it to -2: > > % grep nobody /etc/passwd > nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/nonexistent:/bin/sh Thanks, Jim. Thats why I thought....I guess I was a little confused about UID/GID 65534 vs. -1. Yeah, the other question was the main question, but I will figure it out. I might have a corrupt registry per somethign that was stated about rgyd in the Apollo FAQ...
Back to comp.sys.apollo | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Registry question Kurt Nowak <kurt.m.nowak@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 10:29 -0700
Re: Registry question Jim Rees <jim.rees@rees.org> - 2012-04-19 16:58 -0700
Re: Registry question Kurt Nowak <kurt.m.nowak@gmail.com> - 2012-04-20 10:21 -0700
csiph-web