Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:36:33 -0500
From: Chris Newman <cvjazz@waitrose.com>
Subject: Re: Resurrected RiscPC
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.misc
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:36:21 +0100
Message-ID: <52b47dbeb4cvjazz@waitrose.com>
References: <52b1b009bccvjazz@waitrose.com> <52b45d8634Organizer@avisoft.f9.co.uk> <52b0d51f61bric-nospam@argonet.co.uk>   <52b131adeacvjazz@waitrose.com> <52b278e91acvjazz@waitrose.com> <a6utk4FggjU1@mid.individual.net> <52b3bcd52acvjazz@waitrose.com>   <mpro.m7mdo3000bx0y04eo.lists@thesandfords.me.uk> <52b3e32898cvjazz@waitrose.com> <mpro.m7mp8d01xmn7401ju.news@stevefryatt.org.uk>   <52b3f8f5d4cvjazz@waitrose.com> <a76s5hF4seU1@mid.individual.net> <52b475b87fcvjazz@waitrose.com> <dff27ab452.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com>
User-Agent: Pluto/3.04e (RISC-OS/4.39) NewsHound/v1.52-32
Organization: None
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1YrfwOj4CUB0vvZUQFuR0l4++z+woqwetgDqGD7oRLetTVgMRF21y8U4zIeo4EYIGW+LQV16k93NDYh!bbGkwyI8nOdgmHjSiXX2ZbeBxKXgY/9GBEqDojfX+yUZef7n8yxP1tuZe39rTRnW58nuiaFKjLS5
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2726
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.acorn.misc:5927

In article <dff27ab452.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com>, Dave Higton
<dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
> In message <52b475b87fcvjazz@waitrose.com> Chris Newman
>           <cvjazz@waitrose.com> wrote:

> > In article <a76s5hF4seU1@mid.individual.net>, David Holden
> >   <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 23-Jul-2012, Chris Newman <cvjazz@waitrose.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > IIRC, my 3.7 ROMS weren't numbered or differentiated in any way but
> > > > the Adjust 4.39 were.
> > 
> > > That's because Acorn never intended them to be a 'user upgrade' unlike
> > > all the ROL ROMs and RO 3.1 so they just had a part number instead of
> > > ROM 1, ROM 2, etc. Though, of course, they did become an upgrade when
> > > people fitted Strong ARMs to their RPC 700s.
> > 
> > > If you look at the numbers, ROM 1 is 191-01 and ROM 2 is 192-01.
> > > Similarly with RO 3.6 it's 101-01 and 102-01. Pretty obvious really.
> > 
> > Thanks, Dave. Just as a belt & braces check, which goes in which slot? No
> > 1 should be in the rear slot in all versions?

> If it's going at all, you've got them the right way round.

Still some problems with icons but I'm tracking those down to MenuBar &/or
Larger so seemingly no problem with ROMS.

Cheers,

-- 
Chris Newman