Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Hill Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.misc Subject: Re: Purley Hosting Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:53:03 +0000 (GMT) Organization: timil.com Lines: 29 Message-ID: <5263fcece5tim@invalid.org.uk> References: <5263895397see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <52638bcbf1bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <5263995088bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <52639e0d74see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <52639f337esee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <0f73ab6352.chris@o2.co.uk> <5263ee5f49news@highpath.net> <5922f26352.chris@o2.co.uk> <5263f98f81UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: GqAcIUbqh27oTTI3Dt5hJw.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Pluto/3.04c (RISC-OS/5.16) NewsHound/v1.50-32 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.acorn.misc:3714 In article <5263f98f81UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk>, John Williams (News) wrote: [Snip] > Perhaps a current customer could suggest a Facebook page to Neil [Snip] > I'm afraid I'm not twitterate myself, so can't comment on that aspect > of social networking. There are some (many?) who will neither facebook nor Tweet so would either be a good idea? An email to an alternate address would surely be preferable? A reminder though that, with NetSurf, the mobile sites are useable, if not pretty: http://m.facebook.com http://m.twitter.com -- Tim Hill of timil.com . . . * supports TFT & shares in cheaper ethical telecoms http://tjrh.eu/phone * has a genuine & spam-proof address for Usenet http://www.invalid.org.uk/ * accepts incoming email: substitute postmaster@ for tim@ ... "It is the mind that makes the body rich" T of the S, Act iv, Sc.3