Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.misc, comp.std.misc |
| Subject | Re: Opposition to RFC 7208 - SPF. |
| Date | 2014-06-14 23:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lnjftj$mt8$1@snarked.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ln2inr$kr2$1@snarked.org> <lnhiuh$o0k$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Spam Guy" wrote in message news:lnhiuh$o0k$1@speranza.aioe.org... "D. Stussy" wrote: > Here are my comments regarding RFC 7208. Two questions: 1) what is comp.std.misc? ===== A newsgroup for discussing standards in computing or the Internet. Standards-group RFCs generally end up becoming the approved standard. ===== 2) not knowing what current SMTP-related standards are currently in-place now, or how these various details of RFC 7208 work, will the SMTP software that my server has been running for the past 13 years (Post.Office, circa 1999/2001) continue to be able to send and receive mail to external hosts on port 25? Because that's all I really care about. ===== Yes, and if you ignore RFC 7208, you'll get all the forged spam you deserve as well.
Back to comp.std.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Opposition to RFC 7208 - SPF. "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> - 2014-06-08 13:57 -0700
Re: Opposition to RFC 7208 - SPF. Spam Guy <"Spam"@ Guy. com> - 2014-06-14 09:35 -0400
Re: Opposition to RFC 7208 - SPF. "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> - 2014-06-14 23:53 -0700
Re: Opposition to RFC 7208 - SPF. Spam Guy <"Spam"@Guy. com> - 2014-06-16 15:23 -0400
Re: Opposition to RFC 7208 - SPF. deksd <test@test.test> - 2018-04-03 18:58 +0000
csiph-web