Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Bo Persson" Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Inconsistencies about Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 01:02:33 -0800 (PST) Organization: unknown Lines: 26 Sender: std-cpp-request@vandevoorde.com Approved: james.dennett@gmail.com Message-ID: <9k1447FdauU1@mid.individual.net> References: <071b8c59-6660-40b2-a936-d94fcde65bd6@w1g2000vba.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lCYuQxhrrJytpDf1xYtictnaHikolFTf/OIR02amge4= X-Trace: news.albasani.net 9gGTp8W+aZMlmkpq0tPsRnD1pp8TWRIB9h6u0RrAWIRLbwUdS/gtVKOa+BkDDV2a5qXqkCTsZClqATtO2LCUTA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:02:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Perl5 Mail::Internet v2.05 X-Submission-Address: std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com Cancel-Lock: sha1:aBFCllrOi+urAq+5ruwvlKJsA9A= X-Original-Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 12:33:40 +0100 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.std.c++:388 m0shbear wrote: > This question refers to ISO 14882:2011. > According to [allocator.adapter], there exists a header file > , which defines a template type > scoped_allocator_adapter InnerAlloc>. > However, Table 14 in [headers] makes no such mention of this. > Could I get an explanation on the apparent contradiction? The scoped_allocator_adapter was proposed as an addition to the header, where the std::allocator is defined. It was not until very late in the process that it was moved to its own header. Apparently it was forgotten to add this new header to Table 14. An oversight. Bo Persson -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]