Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sources.d > #72

Re: update netcat 1.11 to netcat 1.12

From Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.tcp-ip, comp.sources.d, news.software.readers
Subject Re: update netcat 1.11 to netcat 1.12
Followup-To comp.protocols.tcp-ip, comp.sources.d
Date 2013-04-21 13:58 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <87ip3gasui.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (permalink)
References <31cee52f-4d64-4731-b235-f52249951005@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.protocols.tcp-ip, comp.sources.d

Show all headers | View raw


>>>>> 程浩  <chenghao0511@gmail.com> writes:

	[Cross-posting to news:comp.protocols.tcp-ip and
	news:comp.sources.d, and setting Followup-To: there, for
	news:news.software.readers doesn't seem to be an appropriate
	newsgroup for Netcat-related discussions in general.]

 > update netcat 1.11 to netcat 1.12

	Which of the Netcat implementations do you suggest to change?
	Please note that there're at least /four/ different Netcats
	currently in use, including the "traditional" Netcat,
	OpenBSD Netcat, GNU Netcat, and Netcat6.  (Cf., e. g., [1].)

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netcat#Variants

 > //nc -lp port (remote )
 > //nc ip port -e cmd.exe (local)
 > //after ctrl+c  cmd.exe no exit,socket no shutdown,remote's nc no exit!
 > //it is a bug!so write netcat 1.12.

	Usually, one doesn't release new versions of the software
	without either acquiring the consent of the current maintainer,
	or changing the name.  Although it's a guideline rather than a
	"strict" rule, failure to follow it may result -- and, in this
	case, have resulted -- in many distinct versions of the code
	being sharing the same name and version.  Consider, e. g.:

--cut: http://eternallybored.org/misc/netcat/ --
    Here's netcat 1.11 compiled for both 32 and 64-bit Windows (but note
    that 64-bit version hasn't been tested much - use at your own risk).
    [...]

    Small update: netcat 1.12 - adds -c command-line option to send CRLF
    line endings instead of just CR (eg. to talk to Exchange SMTP)
--cut: http://eternallybored.org/misc/netcat/ --

 > //only modify doexec.c by chenghao0511@gmail.com

[...]

	Please also consider presenting the change in the "Unified diff"
	format (cf., e. g., [1]), so that the differences will be easy
	to read for anyone concerned.

	(I believe that MinGW provides the "diff.exe" version of the
	GNU diff program, suitable for the W32 and W64 platforms.)

	TIA.

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_diff#Unified_format

-- 
FSF associate member #7257	np. Returning — Jami Sieber

Back to comp.sources.d | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: update netcat 1.11 to netcat 1.12 Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-04-21 13:58 +0000

csiph-web