Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16817
| From | Roland Franzius <roland.franzius@uos.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Three masses and four springs |
| Date | 2014-04-17 09:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lio5r6$5kj$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <lilc5f$qlj$1@smc.vnet.net> |
| Organization | Time-Warner Telecom |
Am 16.04.2014 09:40, schrieb Robert Jenkins:
> The instruction
> DSolve[{-2*x1[t] + x2[t] == x1''[t], -2*x2[t] + x1[t] == x2''[t],
> x1[0] == -1, x2[0] == 2, x1'[0] == 0, x2'[0] == 0}, {x1, x2}, t]
> produces a simple solution. But I am surprised to find the three-mass version produces a mass of complication. Have I made a mistake?
> DSolve[{-2*x1[t] + x2[t] == x1''[t], -2*x2[t] + x3[t] + x1[t] ==
> x2''[t], -2*x3[t] + x2[t] == x3''[t], x1[0] == -1, x2[0] == 2,
> x3[0] == -1, x1'[0] == 0, x2'[0] == 0, x3'[0] == 0}, {x1, x2, x3},
> t]
>
Its not that complicated but it involves a root of a third order
determinant for the eigenfrequency
In[22]:= FullSimplify[{x1[t], x2[t], x3[t]} /.
DSolve[{-2*x1[t] + x2[t] == x1''[t], -2*x2[t] + x3[t] + x1[t] ==
x2''[t], -2*x3[t] + x2[t] == x3''[t], x1[0] == -1, x2[0] == 2,
x3[0] == -1, x1'[0] == 0, x2'[0] == 0, x3'[0] == 0}, {x1[t],
x2[t], x3[t]}, t][[1]]]
Out[22]= {1/
2 ((-1 + Sqrt[2]) Cos[Sqrt[2 - Sqrt[2]] t] - (1 + Sqrt[2]) Cos[
Sqrt[2 + Sqrt[2]] t]),
1/2 (-(-2 + Sqrt[2]) Cos[Sqrt[2 - Sqrt[2]] t] + (2 + Sqrt[2]) Cos[
Sqrt[2 + Sqrt[2]] t]),
1/2 ((-1 + Sqrt[2]) Cos[Sqrt[2 - Sqrt[2]] t] - (1 + Sqrt[2]) Cos[
Sqrt[2 + Sqrt[2]] t])}
--
Roland Franzius
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Three masses and four springs Robert Jenkins <dale.jenkins8@gmail.com> - 2014-04-16 07:40 +0000 Re: Three masses and four springs Roland Franzius <roland.franzius@uos.de> - 2014-04-17 09:11 +0000
csiph-web