Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Rainer Rosenthal <r.rosenthal@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.math.maple
Subject: Re: Kronecker's delta
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 23:50:02 +0100
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <d9ss12Fho6U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <4a4499ba-be58-4dd4-9783-262895c51bf5@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net JKFEmmlDkIBLv7aYd3x6MQRtenbQ6toCnL4SF1xn2AvnBKx+o=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rxi0Pu2lE/Dj2URSXLCvdXsIkM0=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To: <4a4499ba-be58-4dd4-9783-262895c51bf5@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.soft-sys.math.maple:1202

Am 03.11.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Peter Luschny:
> in: 0^0;
> out: 1
> in: seq(0^k, k=0..6);
> out: 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

Hi Peter

isn't this the same topic as in your posting dated 23.06.2015 10:19?
Hmm, yes:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
in: 0^0;
out: 1
in: seq(0^k, k=0..6);
out: 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Title was "0^k".

Cheers,
Rainer