Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.maple > #946
| From | Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.maple |
| Subject | Re: A hypergeometric formula |
| Date | 2014-09-10 20:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <c7bl46Ff4jmU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <0d083247-0434-4923-9388-56b4a98b55e9@googlegroups.com> <877g1b1mwt.fsf@san.rr.com> <84b88022-9fad-4f65-bafd-015f1dfe3004@googlegroups.com> |
On 10.09.2014 20:32, peter.luschny@gmail.com wrote:
>>> 2*GAMMA(3/2)*hypergeom([1/2,0],[3/2,0,-1/2],-1) /sqrt(Pi) = ?
>> (**) y := 2*GAMMA(3/2)*hypergeom([1/2,0],[3/2,0,-1/2],-1) /sqrt(Pi);
>> y := hypergeom([1/2], [-1/2, 3/2], -1)
>> (**) simplify(y);
>> sin(2) - cos(2)
>
> Thank you Joe!
>
> Now this was the easy part. Next the question: Why does Wolfram Alpha
> (and presumably Mathematica) gives a different answer?
>
> 2 Gamma[3/2] (HypergeometricPFQ[{1/2, 0}, {3/2, 0, -1/2}, -1]/Sqrt[Pi])
>
> Peter
I suggest to consider only the 2F3. Wolfram Alpha says " = 1"
and writes it as series in Pochhamer symbols. That series is
seen to be sin(2) - cos(2) by Maple (which re-writes the very
task as 1F3, dropping the zeros).
Feeding the series to Alpha gives sin(2) - cos(2)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=HypergeometricPFQ[{1%2F2%2C+0}%2C+{3%2F2%2C+0%2C+-1%2F2}%2C+-1]
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum%28%28-1%29^k*pochhammer%281%2F2%2Ck%29%2Fk!%2Fpochhammer%28-1%2F2%2Ck%29%2Fpochhammer%283%2F2%2Ck%29%2Ck+%3D+0+..+infinity%29
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.maple | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A hypergeometric formula peter.luschny@gmail.com - 2014-09-10 06:44 -0700
Re: A hypergeometric formula Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> - 2014-09-10 09:05 -0700
Re: A hypergeometric formula peter.luschny@gmail.com - 2014-09-10 11:32 -0700
Re: A hypergeometric formula Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2014-09-10 20:54 +0200
Re: A hypergeometric formula peter.luschny@gmail.com - 2014-09-10 15:08 -0700
Re: A hypergeometric formula acer <maple@rogers.com> - 2014-09-10 21:12 -0700
Re: A hypergeometric formula Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2014-09-11 19:29 +0200
Re: A hypergeometric formula peter.luschny@gmail.com - 2014-09-11 10:42 -0700
csiph-web