Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.maple > #192
| From | Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.maple |
| Subject | Re: AW: Multiple plots with stepped parameters |
| Date | 2011-06-21 23:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <96cfa8FpkdU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <SalmonEgg-4EE972.11212019062011@news60.forteinc.com> <itoedi$f6c$1@solani.org> <SalmonEgg-1D51AE.17330720062011@news60.forteinc.com> |
On 21.06.2011 02:33, Salmon Egg wrote:
> In article<itoedi$f6c$1@solani.org>,
> "Michael Komma"<komma@oe.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>> Conservatives plot:
>>
>> plots:-display([seq(plot(J,nu=0..10,0..20),T=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0])]);
>>
>> Liberals plot:
>>
>> http://www.mikomma.de/planck/planck1.html
>>
>>
>>
>> "Salmon Egg"<SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:SalmonEgg-4EE972.11212019062011@news60.forteinc.com...
>>> My example will based upon blackbody radiation. Suppose the emission at
>>> a frequency nu at various temperatures goes like
>>>
>>> J := 1/(exp(nu/T)-1)
>>>
>>> How do I plot J against nu for all T in a list like
>>>
>>> {0.5, 1.0. 2.0, 5.0, 10.0}?
>>>
>>> I think I see how to do that if I listed separate functions in the plot
>>> command. ie
>>>
>>> 1/(exp(nu/0.5)-1), 1/(exp(nu/1.0)-1), ...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> Conservatives are against Darwinism but for natural selection.
>>> Liberals are for Darwinism but totally against any selection.
>
> This may be just what I am looking for. My German is not good enough for
> me to tell. The point of my post was not to study black body radiation
> but how to do the plotting. It did come about, however, from my wanting
> to show why the color (that is the visible spectral SHAPE) remained the
> same for a black body even as the temperature approached infinity.
> (Wikipedia) In the process it became obvious, that I did not know how to
> use Maple to produce suitable plots. The Maple command you give is
> arcane and I do not see how to get there without guidance like yours.
>
> I am going to continue looking at the German site given in your
> response. I am also looking at the responses by Vogt and Riel until I
> can master this aspect of plotting.
>
To master arcane: I had the same problem learning Maple, but it
is "only" that multiple commands are combined into 1 line, thus
I try to avoid it (and still do it for myself). It simply is too
compact for learning.
I am sure, that Michael Komma can drill it down for you into steps
if you can not succeed starting from the most inner one command
(which is not intended as critics to his replies).
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.maple | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Multiple plots with stepped parameters Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2011-06-19 11:21 -0700
Re: Multiple plots with stepped parameters Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2011-06-19 21:38 +0200
Re: Multiple plots with stepped parameters Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> - 2011-06-19 13:46 -0700
AW: Multiple plots with stepped parameters "Michael Komma" <komma@oe.uni-tuebingen.de> - 2011-06-20 23:34 +0200
Re: AW: Multiple plots with stepped parameters Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2011-06-20 17:33 -0700
Re: AW: Multiple plots with stepped parameters "Barister Mine" <me@privacy.net> - 2011-06-21 07:45 +0300
AW: AW: Multiple plots with stepped parameters "Michael Komma" <komma@oe.uni-tuebingen.de> - 2011-06-21 11:15 +0200
Re: AW: Multiple plots with stepped parameters Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2011-06-21 23:04 +0200
Re: Multiple plots with stepped parameters Roman <wfrisch@gmx.net> - 2011-06-21 00:50 -0700
csiph-web