Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.protocols.kerberos > #5470

Re: interested in discussing some Kerberos improvements

From Geoffrey Thorpe <geoff@geoffthorpe.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.kerberos
Subject Re: interested in discussing some Kerberos improvements
Date 2026-04-02 18:18 -0400
Organization TNet Consulting
Message-ID <mailman.7.1775168297.1813.kerberos@mit.edu> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <990e6964-c1f6-4fe3-adc9-4c3f9109a74b@geoffthorpe.net> <acrvfhQt/ddH8Kfi@ubby> <4ab956b5-f740-4182-bf7f-2ed1499235ee@geoffthorpe.net> <202603310142.62V1gCdW028597@hedwig.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> <0520e122-01cb-4ecb-81fe-b38cddb744ff@geoffthorpe.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/30/26 9:42 PM, Ken Hornstein via Kerberos wrote:
>>> Are you referring to the mode of kinit where it runs a command and keeps
>>> it supplied with fresh tickets?  MIT Kerberos' kinit does not have that
>>> mode.
>>
>> Yes that's what I'm referring to. If it's not yet supported by the MIT
>> kinit, I would certainly recommend that it be added, it's very helpful.
> 
> Can't speak for anyone else, but we use "k5start" for this.

Ahh, that looks like the same feature, judging from the man page. Thanks.

As I understand it, k5start will invoke kinit periodically to handle 
credential refresh, and so if kinit is configured to use pkinit to get 
creds, then it would pick up the cert and key from the file system each 
time kinit is invoked (rather than them being read only once when 
k5start is first run). Is that correct? If so, that's once less feature 
to worry about. :-)

Thanks
Geoff

Back to comp.protocols.kerberos | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: interested in discussing some Kerberos improvements Geoffrey Thorpe <geoff@geoffthorpe.net> - 2026-04-02 18:18 -0400

csiph-web