Path: csiph.com!news.uzoreto.com!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Ingeborg Hellemo Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: bind 9.16.6 on FreeBSD - Assert Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:13:03 +0200 Lines: 44 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: Your message of "Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:48:21 -0000." <202009030913.0839D3NS020189@nordnytt.cc.uit.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1599124406 6341 149.20.1.60 (3 Sep 2020 09:13:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.6 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:48:21 -0000." X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2020 09:13:04.0113 (UTC) FILETIME=[6DE94E10:01D681D2] X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <202009030913.0839D3NS020189@nordnytt.cc.uit.no> Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:16091 SOAN@stofa.dk said: > It is bind 9.16.6, built from ports on FreeBSD 11.3. Same server combination here but different error. Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: resolver.c:5125: INSIST(dns_name_issubdomain(&fctx->name, &fctx->domain)) failed, back trace Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #0 0x43ba00 in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #1 0x61ad8a in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #2 0x5689bb in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #3 0x56e979 in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #4 0x5760b0 in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #5 0x573bc2 in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #6 0x64084c in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: #7 0x80206e036 in ?? Aug 27 01:36:25 chuck named[11975]: exiting (due to assertion failure) Upgraded to bind916-9.16.6_1 om Sep 1, but then once more Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: resolver.c:5125: INSIST(dns_name_issubdomain(&fctx->name, &fctx->domain)) failed, back trace Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #0 0x43d2a0 in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #1 0x62039a in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #2 0x56d84b in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #3 0x573809 in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #4 0x57b260 in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #5 0x578d50 in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #6 0x645e5c in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: #7 0x80246e036 in ?? Sep 2 20:20:22 chuck named[51566]: exiting (due to assertion failure) The server is dualstack and serves DNS via both IPv4 and IPv6. Has anyone observed something similar? --Ingeborg -- Ingeborg Østrem Hellemo -- ingeborg.hellemo@uit.no Dep. of Information Technology --- Univ. of Tromsø