Re: srv lookup in record

From	Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups	comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject	Re: srv lookup in record
Date	2020-08-25 21:40 -0600
Organization	TNet Consulting
Message-ID	<mailman.840.1598413210.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References	<20200826024354.C72A81F2951B@ary.qy> <22383b1d-1698-5741-8ba3-9dcb3048a178@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 8/25/20 8:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
> These SRV records say that the service is on ports 31024, 31852, 
> and 31790 on the respective servers.  CNAME does not give you a 
> port number.  There is no way to fake SRV using CNAME.

Agreed.

I've had some off-line conversations with Marc about some related 
things, so I thought he was only looking for the IP aspect and not 
worried about the port aspect of the SRV records.

-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: srv lookup in record Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-08-25 21:40 -0600

csiph-web