Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From: "Marc Roos" <M.Roos@f1-outsourcing.eu>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject: RE: srv lookup in record
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:45:01 +0200
Lines: 8
Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID: <mailman.822.1598089469.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org>
References: <ecae8f44-61be-f1e3-9ba0-d85d89bcfd59@thedave.ca> <"H000007100179954.1598089501.sx.f1-outsourcing.eu*"@MHS>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1598089517 9848 149.20.1.60 (22 Aug 2020 09:45:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu
To: bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org>, dw <dw@thedave.ca>
Return-Path: <M.Roos@f1-outsourcing.eu>
X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
In-Reply-To: <ecae8f44-61be-f1e3-9ba0-d85d89bcfd59@thedave.ca>
x-scalix-Hops: 1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <"H000007100179954.1598089501.sx.f1-outsourcing.eu*"@MHS>
Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:16065


> I don't think so, nor does it seem to make sense to me that you would=20
> want such a thing (in the general case, you may have a use-case).

What would be better way to solve this then? To filter out only the ip=20
addresses that are in the same netmask?