Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Chuck Aurora Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: Request for review of performance advice Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 13:06:05 -0500 Lines: 14 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: <3A0A6DF0-828F-49A5-83DF-8118FD663522@isc.org> <25e01700abbef5ac1a1963dd324f19f5@nodns4.us> Reply-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1594231581 5709 149.20.1.60 (8 Jul 2020 18:06:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Mail-Reply-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Mail-Followup-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org In-Reply-To: <3A0A6DF0-828F-49A5-83DF-8118FD663522@isc.org> X-Sender: ca@nodns4.us User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <25e01700abbef5ac1a1963dd324f19f5@nodns4.us> X-Mailman-Original-References: <3A0A6DF0-828F-49A5-83DF-8118FD663522@isc.org> Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15935 On 2020-07-07 20:57, Victoria Risk wrote: > A while ago we created a KB article with tips on how to improve your > performance with our Kea dhcp server. The tips were fairly obvious to > our developers and this was pretty successful. We would like to do > something similar for BIND, provide a dozen or so tips for how to > maximize your throughput with BIND. However, as usual, everything is > more complicated with BIND. [big snip] > Any further suggestions, corrections or warnings are very welcome. Vicky, I'd suggest separating these performance tips into two separate articles: authoritative and recursive. Lumping both together is going to create more confusion.