Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.lightlink.com!usenet.osg.ufl.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Hansen Candrawinata Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: Using IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send queries to a DNS server Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:19:53 +1100 Lines: 19 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1320967272 23885 149.20.64.75 (10 Nov 2011 23:21:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WDyjadN8yas3biq4EAFZ8Ds7biR0Oy+fKcF1KPVCwFY=; b=oJzyv8330skeaYnLlk16m3ilWv7SVLYk+i7ioK3sJ9VNA0c06MOqbyJTXDh2eMNR5k HuDJSNiLeAx26nqsLXfX0qgv0kkLkiITF81zlwjFK/lvyez/+CDMEpBnS0bSKX7m5YUv /zkmtny5lKF5Mh6K4ZvmLGMgRuL/VuEbG3H+k= In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.ams1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.protocols.dns.bind:96 Thanks for the responses. Can a DNS server (the machine, not BIND) be a tunnel endpoint for 6to4? Thanks, Hansen On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Hansen Candrawinata wrote: > This is not strictly a BIND related question, but thought someone here > probably knew the answer. > > Is it valid to use IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send DNS queries to a DNS server. > > Does anyone know what the standards (RFCs) say about this? > > Thanks.