Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!nntp.terraraq.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Lee Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: Fwd: DNS Misconfiguration on- http://cyberia.net.sa/ Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 20:33:21 -0400 Lines: 37 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1591403609 3868 149.20.1.60 (6 Jun 2020 00:33:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" To: Fred Morris Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iWG6QftKrpLI32WzSVHLOdiqzKbvR9R2D4dCI5Yn8SA=; b=LvMvVKNmSXWiSgZWJNg8FNy2IsorkVcHVrP6npT6kZaM8EKUEAwLld35AznehwdQxb v+8AVmyF6WYBQ3G0qk5L8gCkttxu6mFbHAbW2PhLqlyF/UZrZagG2gD5vdZCkMcVs4l2 jv0qTI8/PZc+jnCkOkoFEXZk6uihax6T1W9hmTgiBfPkkdqWgIHT4tNcCnQ8E7ykX17P 7QShvhw1kS4K9BBm9LhNbtkjNO2EUX3Aza0taYrk+bI6fhKzlnikDNftiTocITXpQgMN 2HDZnIiNgKEmtY/aamqjQHTA951nsY/+yCUkEDp/2KcCi03CqK82W/0M79nsIoJIuJlJ vTgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iWG6QftKrpLI32WzSVHLOdiqzKbvR9R2D4dCI5Yn8SA=; b=oKk156SPzbOS1OVeo3rc4k+r0CBhaj3ofGZxb2B/iQmDNgVbVxr6/i6z1odUkA60Fg ZBELN5Sj1ncdIyqNJ+rb4XdwYhpCwr46GRr8EtleLCbfXU3EBkT7PmhUzZ4Ry2BG8Gao v3RJw2oDN1t8gml2cAJDu6erlE9OiaWGeM+L6YPSTAmtCJ4liHZqXZfiP+gATzPHRati GNc9YdNgOcH9QtQ+NWayhSKeJMnNI5i++ezcv6rWscVYifp6ghOyD1qnk630Ay1l/iGy /BSCMsPlmh1gz2Xtn0TvA8JbojYfyXAZxZ//WcGg/rKTg1uA1dCD6BrrNz7c1CYVmxvV mOuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iMBTolpN9TaSrS8pZ2gkr6NHuI2tk0jJi4j+4gh/4bHQYjBZq +uBt7cXtIhv6dZq9+kvFfhXzXSNtBILZ0YslUO7F8Uzz X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRWjF/ueCPQwRkRfKQSTnzyp4Nav5USxa8nauK/DHI8Bk4zudFdfs1B5t9+EpIMjudf71MtGTGz4Y8LnXAJoc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:21cc:: with SMTP id h12mr12394764qka.194.1591403601791; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:33:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15822 On 6/5/20, Fred Morris wrote: > Hrmmm... I'm reminded of something else I've seen reported on recently... > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Ejaz Ahmed wrote: >> localhost.cyberia.net.sa > > I don't know if you've been paying attention, but it's been reported that > among others EBay has been port scanning visitor's devices [0]. Having > localhost.ebay.com could be handy for them in terms of circumventing some > rules on setting of cookies and the execution of scripts. Not saying > that's what they're doing, heaven forbid. > > Any domain you visit could have entries in it which point to e.g. > localhost or nonrouting addresses commonly used for gateways, things like > that. > > This is not a DNS problem, it's a problem in what commonly used programs > aid and abet in the name of "freedom of commerce" or something. It's possible to block with rpz & something else that I can't recall right now. I did RPZ blocking first, so I didn't bother changing ; return NXDOMAIN for any 127.0.0.0/8 answers ; exceptions: onea.net-snmp.org CNAME rpz-passthru. twoa.net-snmp.org CNAME rpz-passthru. localhost CNAME rpz-passthru. 8.0.0.0.127.rpz-ip CNAME . ; 127.0.0.0/8 ; check: ; localhost 127.0.0.1 ; onea.net-snmp.org 127.0.0.1 ; twoa.net-snmp.org 127.0.0.2 127.0.0.3 All my other host names that used to return 127.0.0.1 answers don't any more :( Anyone know some valid names I can use for testing? Lee