Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.lightlink.com!usenet.osg.ufl.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Hansen Candrawinata Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Using IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send queries to a DNS server Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:05:09 +1100 Lines: 8 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1320897966 29801 149.20.64.75 (10 Nov 2011 04:06:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=kTLVmWnfvhe8vUJ0qjG3e2uTFy6wxUh6Lc+GC8yeb4s=; b=N47f/39qJwLBUdQygK0105/uM7Nfj12pMvF+kVWAxtwjRG4ooOBCyXoHGUYQywfG0J kGVcwiYu65YqxwWT7bRjJzPcOJ03SxBOXj6K3fgPUYdVsM+rifLYLqSUq8xveys3DXkU EVS4e0qprdbwfA5ch99XqhWDeXMweg5ZXN8sc= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.ams1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.protocols.dns.bind:82 This is not strictly a BIND related question, but thought someone here probably knew the answer. Is it valid to use IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send DNS queries to a DNS server. Does anyone know what the standards (RFCs) say about this? Thanks.