Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals

From	olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals
Date	2025-03-04 09:56 -0600
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vq77s3$1u8bl$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <08508353c793195b12c3d1ee161d4f98117edeea@i2pn2.org> <vq72um$1tapm$4@dont-email.me> <vq73q6$1t6ut$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/4/2025 8:47 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 04/03/2025 14:32, olcott wrote:
>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
>> exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
>> own "ret" instruction.
> 
> If that is the only rebuttal you are prepared to accept as valid, 
> congratulations! You have solved the Halting Problem entirely to your 
> own satisfaction.
> 
> If you want to be recognised for your breakthrough, however, it is not 
> enough that nobody should convince you that you're wrong; you have to 
> convince others that you're right,

If they can not show how DD correctly emulated by HHH
reaches its own "ret" instruction this proves that they
lack the technical competence to understand that the
code proves that HHH(DD) is correct to reject its input
as non-terminating.

> and that means explaining exactly why 
> their criticisms are ill-founded. Saying "I'm right and I won't listen 
> to anyone claiming otherwise" lacks explanatory power.
> 
> F'ups set.
> 


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-03-04 09:56 -0600
  Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 16:38 +0000

csiph-web