Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Willem Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: quantifying bloat Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 20:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Stack Usenet News Service Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <12217875.401.1335542191031.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjj38> <1rnzov5qdfjg9$.1xzgbukwvzdqc$.dlg@40tude.net> <1dae75e0-2ddc-425f-99e4-3af9f7406926@k13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <3leyi3uyxhlh$.vl287d3q1va2.dlg@40tude.net> <1saien0an92og.iuio4t54i82a$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: toad.stack.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: mud.stack.nl 1336163554 58046 2001:610:1108:5010::135 (4 May 2012 20:32:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@stack.nl NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 20:32:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (FreeBSD) Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:1535 hopcode wrote: ) Il 04.05.2012 16:05, Dmitry A. Kazakov ha scritto: )> On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:52:35 +0000 (UTC), Willem wrote: )> )>> > Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: )>> > ) On Thu, 3 May 2012 09:27:22 -0700 (PDT), gremnebulin wrote: )>> > )> Pi is computable. )>> > ) )>> > ) Not its decimal representation by a FSM. )>> > )>> > 'computable' has a specific mathematical definition, )>> > by which pi is computable. )> That definition requires specification of a formal computation model. ) ) pi is not computable. Again: According to mathematicians, it *is* computable. SaSW, Willem -- Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged or something.. No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you ! #EOT