Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #865
| From | Gr <g@g.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Heapsort Complexity Analysis |
| Date | 2011-09-27 10:52 +0530 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j5rmja$6nj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Heapsort worst case complexity is obviously nLogN. However, what's the best case complexity? Can we consider that the siftup(fixup) & siftdown(fixdown) operations will be done in constant time, so the complexity of heapsort would be n? Is this correct - if not what's the best case scenario for heapsort?
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Heapsort Complexity Analysis Gr <g@g.com> - 2011-09-27 10:52 +0530
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-09-27 07:14 +0000
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-09-27 02:45 -0700
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-09-27 04:11 -0700
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-27 13:01 +0100
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-09-27 05:53 -0700
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Gr <g@g.com> - 2011-09-28 01:33 +0530
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2011-09-27 16:35 -0700
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-27 21:08 -0400
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-25 00:59 +0000
Re: Heapsort Complexity Analysis "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2012-01-25 01:23 +0000
csiph-web