Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: Another little puzzle Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 19:59:14 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <87cz7ox0fh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <87tu1diu2s.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <864jtdtkt5.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87o7rlhtsv.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <878rioifnh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <868rinskhk.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87zgb3giu6.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <86cz7pnji2.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87ilhgx152.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dc4bdde2c7b818e72ded116daac42e58"; logging-data="4121219"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ki2sh+d3jy0XKz4F8uJ3OJsSumf0sJvk=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:btZ5ZljWCNeyJnrV4OTRsENRYnY= sha1:5QQ6FksVV0QG+TBBjrzIV8qR11o= X-BSB-Auth: 1.289b2c2d8c155bff96c2.20230108195914GMT.87cz7ox0fh.fsf@bsb.me.uk Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:16270 Ben Bacarisse writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > >> Ben Bacarisse writes: > >>> The "other" average, minimises the sum of the of the angular >>> distances. >> >> I think you mean it minimizes the sum of the squares of the >> angular distances. > > Yes thanks. I originally thought I'd write an abbreviation but then I > convinced myself I would not forget any of the "squares of"s. Proof > reading might have been useful too. > >>>> and the center of mass is never on the unit >>>> circle (not counting the case when all the time values are the >>>> same). Even so it's an interesting way to view the distinction. >>> >>> It's more interesting because it really is about chords! >> >> I don't buy the "really" here. The center of mass is fundamental >> and always well-defined. Furthermore it works for collections of >> points that are not all on the same circle or sphere. Looking at >> the problem in terms of chords seems somewhat artificial, or at >> least less fundamental. > > There are other ways for something to be interesting (at least to me). > When you plot the two averages, and look at the chords vs the arcs, it > becomes clear why one average "looks" more average than the other. I can see a possible misunderstanding here. You might have taken my "it really is about chords" to mean "it is fundamentally about chords", but I said "it really is about chords" because you thought I'd used the word chord incorrectly to refer to the lines between the centre of mass and the data points. I was saying "I really did mean chords". -- Ben.