Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Rust vs Hype (was Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 03:30:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <1073r0b$nfj$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <106lbus$155i0$1@dont-email.me> <106rcg0$etv$1@reader1.panix.com> <10700ep$3g52n$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 03:30:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="24051"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:16849

In article <10700ep$3g52n$1@dont-email.me>,
David Brown  <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>On 05.08.2025 00:33, Dan Cross wrote:
>
>> I'd say, give it a whirl.  You may feel the same, but you may
>> also be pleasantly (or perhaps unpleasantly!) surprised.  In any
>> event, I'd like to know how it turns out.
>> 
>> 	- Dan C
>> 
>
>Circumstances limit me from giving a detailed reply here.  But I do want 
>to thank you for your time and the information and experiences you have 
>shared here.  Perhaps precisely because you are not evangelising, you 
>are a lot more convincing than many things I have read.  It will take me 
>some time before I can give Rust a fair trial for my coding, but I will 
>definitely see how I can fit it in, and compare it to how I work now in 
>C and C++.

Thanks for the kind words: I totally get it, and I respect your
approach.  I do hope you get an opportunity to take it for a
spin, and please, do post about your experiences when you do.

	- Dan C.