Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 22:34:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <106rchj$etv$2@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <106cf06$32d5u$1@dont-email.me> <106cvpj$gac$1@reader1.panix.com> <106lf4d$15pv5$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 22:34:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="15295"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:16841

In article <106lf4d$15pv5$1@dont-email.me>,
David Brown  <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>On 30/07/2025 13:30, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <106cf06$32d5u$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>> [snip]
>Without taking any sides here, it is easy to make the mistake of 
>thinking that logical rules can apply to sets of propositions in the 
>same way as they apply to propositions.  This leads to the famous Cheese 
>Sandwich Theorem:
>
>1. Nothing is better than complete happiness.
>2. A cheese sandwich is better than nothing.
>3. Therefore, a cheese sandwich is better than complete happiness.
>
>Time for lunch :-)

Make it pastrami on rye and you may be onto something there. :-D

	- Dan C.