Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:00:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <106dmkp$6hj$2@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <106cf06$32d5u$1@dont-email.me> <106cvpj$gac$1@reader1.panix.com> <106df2q$39nv6$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:00:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="6707"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:16831

In article <106df2q$39nv6$1@dont-email.me>,
Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>On 30/07/2025 12:30, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <106cf06$32d5u$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>> But I've made my point, so on that note I will underline my
>>> acknowledgement that I'm being ++picky.
>> 
>> I fear I am, as well.
>
>And thus it is that two complete strangers have a blazing row in 
>public, not a single punch is thrown or expletive uttered, and 
>they end with a smile and a handshake.

The state of violent agreement!  :-)

>Gotta love Usenet.

I do miss the collegial atmosphere of older USENET.

	- Dan C.