Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.programming > #16781

Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”

Show all headers | View raw

On 23/05/2025 00:33, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:14:17 +0200, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> 
>> But we know better: the one best practice that would be relevant there
>> is *do not use magic values*.
> 
> I think the writer was trying to make a point about

Is this the first time you hear there is something
wrong with the booleans?  And similar stupid shit?

Opinion leaders start some insane and self-serving
bullshit, be it the promotion of the latest magic
positions, or vice versa the bullshitting of whatever
is most sacred of our discipline: and a legion of
blog(ger)s just copies, maybe rephrases, and multiplies.
And a legion of incompetent programmers falls for it.

That's been going on for three decades now.  Indeed,
sorry for the wake up call, but, software-wise, 95%
of all that is available online, from the guidance
to the blogs, is not even wrong to put it charitably.

>      saveUser(user, true, false);
> with something more like

Here is another maxim: you cannot learn anything at
all about writing code from just the 5 liners!  Sure,
you can speculate, ad libitum: which is yet another
way in which all of that is *the exact opposite* of
what one should do in this job.  But just reread my
initial post, it's all already there, what one should
do, and how it fundamentally differs, in level and
direction from what you are chasing there.

And here is rather a tip: how many lines of code have
you read in your entire life?  For some reference,
I think I have spent at least my first 15 years of
profession not just seriously studying (SE) while
conscientiously practising, but also reading/studying
thousands and thousands and thousands of lines of code
of existing non trivial systems or specific solutions,
written by people who were more expert than me.
Thousands and even hundred thousands: not 5-ish.

Enough said: I won't belabour the point further.

-Julio

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

“Booleans Considered Harmful” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-22 06:51 +0000
  Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-05-22 11:14 +0200
    Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-05-22 12:04 +0200
    Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-22 22:33 +0000
      Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-05-23 07:04 +0200
  Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-22 13:51 +0200
    Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-05-22 14:43 +0200
      Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-05-22 14:57 +0200
  Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-22 12:27 -0700
  Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” JJ <jj4public@outlook.com> - 2025-05-23 16:56 +0700
    Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-23 22:58 +0000
  Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-23 22:48 +0000
  Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful” c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-18 02:40 -0400

csiph-web