Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1603

Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores

From	"Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
Subject	Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores
Date	2013-06-21 13:13 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<kq2c4h$scm$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<kq09he$vbk$2@dont-email.me><kq0n9k$7ts$1@speranza.aioe.org> <20130621174717.71e07762@bother.homenet>

Show all headers | View raw

"Chris Vine"  wrote in message 
news:20130621174717.71e07762@bother.homenet...

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:09 -0700
"Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> wrote:
[...]
> > Calm down a little bit and ponder the thought Aminer...

> However, you are largely responsible for this latest (cross-posted)
> outburst. Why not leave the guy be.  Or at least have only one
> newsgroup spammed.

Humm... I feel as if I opened Pandora's box?

I was just trying to plant a seed.

:^o

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-06-20 22:11 -0700
  Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2013-06-21 17:47 +0100
    Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-06-21 13:13 -0700

csiph-web