Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads
Subject: Re: About Parallel sort library....
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:25:25 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <k7bv84$d6t$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <k795jv$dr5$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: EsvalpzLbdyjanwP0yLIHw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:1226

Am 05.11.2012 21:55, schrieb aminer (moron):

> Hello,
> I have stress tested Parallel Sort library ...

You're living in a different reality than those reading your posts
(or not). No one is interestet in your ridiculous trivial algorithm
libraries and even less people are interested in any refinements;
and even lesser because your code is written in a rather exotic
language.
Check your server-logs to see how many people download your code
to see that I'm right. And stop spamming this newsgroup with
announcements of tiny changes of your "library".

Look what real parallelization libraries like TBB look like. Then
you recognize what people dealing with parallelization really need.