Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1184
| From | "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: ParallelSort version 3.0 |
| Date | 2012-10-24 10:57 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k68ve9$uk1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <k68sg9$c66$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, My Parallel BucketSort works with strings only at the moment... But ParallelSort library works with all sort of types, like Integers , strings, doubles etc. I have tried to bring you the best, so i hope that you will be happy with the new version of ParallelSort library. You can download ParallelSort library and all my other parallel libraries from: http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> wrote in message news:k68sg9$c66$1@dont-email.me... > Hello, > > Parallel Sort Library was updated to version 3.0. > > In this new version i have implemented a Parallel hybrid > divide-and-conquer merge algorithm that performs 0.9-5.8 times better than > sequential merge, on a quad-core processor, with larger arrays > outperforming by over 5 times. Parallel processing combined with a hybrid > algorithm approach provides a powerful high performance result. > > > Description: > > Parallel Sort Library that supports Parallel Quicksort, Parallel HeapSort > and Parallel MergeSort on Multicores systems. > > Parallel Sort Library uses my Thread Pool Engine and quicksort many array > parts - of your array - in parallel using Quicksort or HeapSort or > MergeSort and after that it finally merge them - with the merge() > procedure - > > In the previous parallelsort version i have parallelized only the sort > part, but in this new parallelsort version i have parallelized also the > merge procedure part and it gives better performance. > > I have implemented a Parallel hybrid divide-and-conquer merge algorithm > that performs 0.9-5.8 times better than sequential merge, on a quad-core > processor, with larger arrays outperforming by over 5 times. Parallel > processing combined with a hybrid algorithm approach provides a powerful > high performance result. > > And as you know , Quicksort is a divide and conquer algorithm that have > the following best case performance: > > T(n) = T(n/2) + T(n/2) + O(n) > = 2T(n/2) + (n) > > And from case 2 of Master theorem, the recurrence equation gives: > > T(n) = (n lg n) > > > Parallelizing the Sorts > > One way to parallelize the sorts is: > > Divide the data among the processors > Sort the data on the individual processors. > Merge the various data > > Note that the merge operation is a reduction operation ! > > > And please look at test.pas inside the zip, a parallel quicksort on many > cores, you have to compile and run gendata.pas before running test.pas, > and please set the number of threads to 8 times the number of cores to be > more optimal, i have giving you an exemple on how to do it , look inside > test.pas... > > You can download ParallelSort library from: > > http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ > > > > Thank you, > Amine Moulay Ramdane. > > >
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ParallelSort version 3.0 "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-10-24 10:07 -0500 Re: ParallelSort version 3.0 "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-10-24 10:49 -0500 Re: ParallelSort version 3.0 "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-10-24 10:57 -0500 Re: ParallelSort version 3.0 "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-10-24 11:25 -0500
csiph-web