Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1150
| From | "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Threadpool engien and scalability [1] |
| Date | 2012-10-01 14:02 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k4clsk$3mf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <k4ci68$8ho$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
It's a socialist soldier from in the heart of America ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5FCdx7Dn0o Amine Moulay Ramdane. "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:k4ci68$8ho$1@dont-email.me... > Hello, > > I have corrected my mistakes , please read again: > > If you take a look at my threadpool engine: > > http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ > > you will notice that it does not scale in the execute() method > cause LockedIncLong(balance1) is expensive. > > here is the execute method: > > == > > function TThreadPool.execute(func:TMyProc;const Context: Pointer): > Boolean; > > var > local_balance,local_count:long; > > params: PParams; > p:pointer; > > begin > new(params); > setlength(params^,1); > params^[0].proc:=func; > params^[0].data:=context; > > local_balance:=LockedIncLong(balance1) mod FThreadCount; > while not Queues[local_balance].push(tobject(params)) do sleep(0); > events[local_balance].setevent; > end; > > === > > Now to be able to scale the execute() method we have to add a new > execute1() method that will be called from mutiple threads, i have to > use LockedIncLong() but it will be called only once: > > == > > function TThreadPool.execute1(func:TMyProc;const Context: > Pointer;index:long): Boolean; > > params: PParams; > p:pointer; > > begin > new(params); > setlength(params^,1); > params^[0].proc:=func; > params^[0].data:=context; > > if index = 0 > then > begin > index:=LockedIncLong(balance1) mod FThreadCount; > end; > > while not Queues[index].push(tobject(params)) do sleep(0); > events[index].setevent; > end; > > = > > > so we have to call the execute1() method from mutiple threads like this: > > and we have to initialize index to zero before:, like this: > > ThreadPool.execute1(myproc,data,index) > > I am using mutiple lockfree FIFO queues inside my threadpool engine, > so that there is less contention and using work-stealing also, so after > adding execute1() methods , this threadpool engine will become scalable. > this threadpool engine can also be used as a scalable queue > (not a strict FIFO queue, but it's also useful). > > This threadpool engine is useful and that is what's important. > > > > I will try to update my threadpol engine soon. > > > > Thank you, > Amine Moulay Ramdane. > > > >
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Threadpool engien and scalability [1] "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 12:59 -0500 Re: Threadpool engien and scalability [1] "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 13:34 -0500 Re: Threadpool engien and scalability [1] "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 13:48 -0500 Re: Threadpool engien and scalability [1] "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 14:02 -0500
csiph-web