Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1144
| From | "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... |
| Date | 2012-10-01 12:36 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k4cgqj$v06$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <k4ce5t$cv8$5@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello,
I have corrected a mistake in execute1() method , here it is again:
==
function TThreadPool.execute1(func:TMyProc;const Context:
Pointer;index:long): Boolean;
params: PParams;
p:pointer;
begin
new(params);
setlength(params^,1);
params^[0].proc:=func;
params^[0].data:=context;
if index = 0
then
begin
inc(index);
index:=index mod FThreadCount;
end;
while not Queues[index].push(tobject(params)) do sleep(0);
events[index].setevent;
end;
=
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
"aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:k4ce5t$cv8$5@dont-email.me...
>
> Hello,
>
> If you take a look at my threadpool engine:
>
> http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/
>
> you will notice that it does not scale in the execute() method
> cause LockedIncLong(balance1) is expensive.
>
> here is the execute method:
>
> ==
>
> function TThreadPool.execute(func:TMyProc;const Context: Pointer):
> Boolean;
>
> var
> local_balance,local_count:long;
>
> params: PParams;
> p:pointer;
>
> begin
> new(params);
> setlength(params^,1);
> params^[0].proc:=func;
> params^[0].data:=context;
>
> local_balance:=LockedIncLong(balance1) mod FThreadCount;
> while not Queues[local_balance].push(tobject(params)) do sleep(0);
> events[local_balance].setevent;
> end;
>
> ===
>
> Now to be able to scale the execute() method we have to add a getindex()
> method like this
>
> function TThreadPool.getindex(var index:long);
> begin
> if index <> 0
> then
> begin
> inc(index);
> index:=index mod FThreadCount;
> end;
> end;
>
>
> and also add an execute1() method that scales perfectly like this:
>
> ==
> function TThreadPool.execute1(func:TMyProc;const Context:
> Pointer;index:long): Boolean;
>
> var
> local_balance,local_count:long;
>
> params: PParams;
> p:pointer;
>
> begin
> new(params);
> setlength(params^,1);
> params^[0].proc:=func;
> params^[0].data:=context;
>
> while not Queues[index].push(tobject(params)) do sleep(0);
> events[local_balance].setevent;
> end;
>
> ==
>
> so we have to call the getindex() method from mutiple threads like this:
>
> // we have to initialize count to zero before:
>
> getindex(count)
> ThreadPool.execute(myproc,data,count)
>
> and now the execute1() method will scale perfectly.
>
>
> I will try update my threadpol engine soon.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 11:51 -0500 Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 11:54 -0500 Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 12:06 -0500 Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 12:18 -0500 Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 12:30 -0500 Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 12:36 -0500 Re: My threadpool engine and scalability... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-10-01 12:43 -0500
csiph-web