Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1039
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | About Parallel Merging paper... |
| Date | Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:36:16 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 21 |
| Message-ID | <k1dqb6$7cb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:36:22 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c43ca82f9e8d62a602307fe9d2e9b807"; logging-data="7563"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VM0/xkPu1Xj7RjCyyCMCD" |
| X-MimeOLE | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 |
| X-RFC2646 | Format=Flowed; Original |
| X-Newsreader | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:EdL3GTGEHa/sWi5obHHbZP5+Y3g= |
| X-Priority | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority | Normal |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:1039 comp.programming:2121 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello, I have just read the following paper on Parallel Merging: http://www.economyinformatics.ase.ro/content/EN4/alecu.pdf And i have implemented this algorithm just to see what is the performance. And i have noticed that the serial algorithm is 8 times slower than the merge function that you find in the serial mergesort algorithm. So 8 times slower, it's too slow. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
About Parallel Merging paper... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 14:36 -0500 Re: About Parallel Merging paper... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 14:45 -0500
csiph-web