Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gerald Breuer Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.programming Subject: Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <503754A7.83DEC3D8@bytecraft.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: EsvalpzLbdyjanwP0yLIHw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:1021 comp.programming:2099 Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC: >> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index. > Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use > flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them. That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like templates. If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them in a language that this people use.