Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1508

Re: Thread scaling in Windows

Date 2013-06-01 15:09 +0200
From Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads
Subject Re: Thread scaling in Windows
References (2 earlier) <XnsA1D1132254871myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <51a8ab52$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <XnsA1D1D5409B3C5myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <51a90f46$0$6626$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <51a9ea61$0$15975$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID <51a9f2a1$0$9505$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (permalink)
Organization Arcor

Show all headers | View raw


On 01.06.13 14.34, Casper H.S. Dik wrote:
> There is no such thing as "lock free".  So-called "lock free"
> algorithms simply punt the locking to the hardware were it becomes
> invisible (well,  other than from the performance counters)
> and also uncontrollable.

But hardware locking is available since 486. And it is almost always 
significantly faster than semaphores.
Furthermore the lock free smart pointers are typically wait free too. 
And this makes a difference since no thread could stop another thread 
anymore.


Marcel

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-29 12:31 -0500
  Re: Thread scaling in Windows Robert Miles <robertmilesxyz@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 17:26 -0700
    Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-30 16:11 -0500
      Re: Thread scaling in Windows Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2013-05-31 03:44 +0200
        Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-31 00:29 -0500
  Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-05-30 23:28 +0200
    Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-30 17:52 -0500
      Re: Thread scaling in Windows Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2013-05-31 04:18 +0200
      Re: Thread scaling in Windows Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-31 01:11 -0500
        Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-01 12:15 -0500
          Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-01 16:52 -0500
            Re: Thread scaling in Windows [SOLVED] Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-03 12:00 -0500
              Re: Thread scaling in Windows [SOLVED] Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2013-06-04 08:16 +0000
              Re: Thread scaling in Windows [SOLVED] Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2013-06-04 10:25 +0200
      Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-05-31 15:53 +0200
        Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-31 12:57 -0500
          Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-05-31 22:59 +0200
            Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-01 03:06 -0500
              Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-06-01 15:20 +0200
                Re: Thread scaling in Windows Drazen Kacar <dave@fly.srk.fer.hr> - 2013-06-02 06:35 +0000
            Re: Thread scaling in Windows Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2013-06-01 12:34 +0000
              Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-06-01 15:09 +0200
                Re: Thread scaling in Windows Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2013-06-01 17:12 +0000

csiph-web