Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1508
| Date | 2013-06-01 15:09 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: Thread scaling in Windows |
| References | (2 earlier) <XnsA1D1132254871myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <51a8ab52$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <XnsA1D1D5409B3C5myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <51a90f46$0$6626$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <51a9ea61$0$15975$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
| Message-ID | <51a9f2a1$0$9505$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Arcor |
On 01.06.13 14.34, Casper H.S. Dik wrote: > There is no such thing as "lock free". So-called "lock free" > algorithms simply punt the locking to the hardware were it becomes > invisible (well, other than from the performance counters) > and also uncontrollable. But hardware locking is available since 486. And it is almost always significantly faster than semaphores. Furthermore the lock free smart pointers are typically wait free too. And this makes a difference since no thread could stop another thread anymore. Marcel
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-29 12:31 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Robert Miles <robertmilesxyz@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 17:26 -0700
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-30 16:11 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2013-05-31 03:44 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-31 00:29 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-05-30 23:28 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2013-05-31 04:18 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-31 01:11 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-01 12:15 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-01 16:52 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows [SOLVED] Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-03 12:00 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows [SOLVED] Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2013-06-04 08:16 +0000
Re: Thread scaling in Windows [SOLVED] Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2013-06-04 10:25 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-05-31 15:53 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-05-31 12:57 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-05-31 22:59 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2013-06-01 03:06 -0500
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-06-01 15:20 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Drazen Kacar <dave@fly.srk.fer.hr> - 2013-06-02 06:35 +0000
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2013-06-01 12:34 +0000
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-06-01 15:09 +0200
Re: Thread scaling in Windows Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2013-06-01 17:12 +0000
csiph-web