Path: csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alexander Terekhov Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads Subject: Re: forcing the compiler to reload from memory with c++0x Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:39:54 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4D4C1DCA.69308F8E@web.de> References: <4d3cee42$0$1209$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <1d21ad0a-db55-460e-aeb6-66f6d19369ea@i13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <4d3e2e3f$0$21517$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <4D40A4C7.16E6F9AE@web.de> <69d82db7-34be-4de7-86c4-2f39cc1e6df3@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4d4221e9$0$17247$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <947b33d5-2509-4f0c-9256-a7c3de35578e@24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <87mxmlxxry.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <87oc6yxdcw.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <87sjw8w4b5.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <87sjw49oe8.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> Reply-To: terekhov@web.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="rjEYssPBnvQCB352RfJgNw"; logging-data="30996"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4VRBJe0j7BnWxa6oH5W3J6j8kcWscL7Y=" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Cancel-Lock: sha1:4X8iew9Q8HehfY1pX25sa7jaodM= Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:1798 Anthony Williams wrote: [...] > I'm saying if you want to force the compiler to emit a specific > sequence of operations (at the assembly level) then you need to use > volatile. The C/C++ does not guarantee the existence of assembly level to begin with. "Assembly level" can be the same text as coded in C/C++ top level (front end) and implementation can simply interpret/execute it. regards, alexander.