Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.programming.literate > #7
| From | "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@sacrideo.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.literate |
| Subject | Re: Is Literate Programming useful or not? |
| Date | 2011-06-22 19:42 -0400 |
| Organization | Indiana University |
| Message-ID | <ittukm$7n2$1@labrador.cs.tufts.edu> (permalink) |
| References | <sfid-H-20110316-120208-+46.67-1@multi.osbf.lua> <ilqmu6$3fo$1@labrador.cs.tufts.edu> <sfid-H-20110622-194205-+34.88-1@multi.osbf.lua> |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:02:14 -0400, dtopham <dtopham@gmail.com> wrote: > I just found this interesting article and I am interested in what > proponents of LP think: > > http://www.codeproject.com/News.aspx?ntag=21513527334654139 I like the point about non-textual representations of code. I actually use Scheme (using ChezWEB for LP) and APL. APL has workspaces and allows you to create interactive documentation inside of your actual code environment. I haven't figured out the best practices yet, but I think there is much potential in that model. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.
Back to comp.programming.literate | Next | Find similar
Re: Is Literate Programming useful or not? "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2011-06-22 19:42 -0400
csiph-web