Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Salvador Mirzo Newsgroups: comp.periphs.printers Subject: Re: printer stenography today Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:00:38 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <87ikofboix.fsf@example.com> References: <874j012idy.fsf@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:00:39 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9125f63eae9f285c8c54a9dc0d873455"; logging-data="2141929"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+duKjJpQESshinGjeRE/zQ8zvczuQiFmk=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:mE4U2h5aGFZ9VaGL5Ttqy8ppTU8= sha1:8yE4Jb3QW/CX1GI0pIcIRoG1xzY= Xref: csiph.com comp.periphs.printers:4714 Bob Eager writes: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:13:29 -0300, Salvador Mirzo wrote: > >> Is it still the case that printers add microscopic marks to every page >> printed? I have a Brother HL-L2360DW. Does it do it? > > ITYM 'steganography' which is a bit different to stenography. This may > help if you are trying to Google it. > > I don't know. Thanks. I misspelled it.