Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.printers
Subject: printer stenography today
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:13:29 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 2
Message-ID: <874j012idy.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:13:30 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="284b53354082a8681c403d325df2439b"; logging-data="1405261"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/b7ELKPSnvmUWUCJkJ0Rt4RgBBgrNvOAo="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:N5I1AbCAytxz7q0VHd1XZk+aqy4= sha1:B58mQJUL/H0sDRrJpxv489gouBI=
Xref: csiph.com comp.periphs.printers:4712

Is it still the case that printers add microscopic marks to every page
printed?  I have a Brother HL-L2360DW.  Does it do it?