Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.periphs.printers > #4788
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.periphs.printers, comp.periphs.printers |
| Subject | Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print |
| Date | 2025-12-15 01:00 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10hnmjb$1gh7t$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <slrn10jgec3.ipds.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <10hjdqs$3tbas$1@dont-email.me> <slrn10jscea.3cejn.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <10hm6la$vhqf$1@dont-email.me> <slrn10jtfug.3joqv.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2025-12-14, Lars Poulsen wrote: > I'm trying to keep attributions straight, but without a script to do it, > I am nearing my limit. I've been in the habit of trying to trim down, but then I'll start leaving as-is in this thread, in case it helps you with that. (Also, when I first replied, I tried to reply to both your posts on both newsgroups. Sadly, some idiot (me) overlooked the fact that the References: header is *not* comma-separated, that there should only have been blanks in between the values. So that's why it didn't thread properly in both groups.) > On 2025-12-13, Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> NS> So it's failing for all systems, despite having been triggered by the >>> NS> Windows 11 update? > >>> NS> Is it feasible to try to use it without Windows 11 just to see if the >>> NS> problem re-appears? > > On 2025-12-14, Lars Poulsen wrote: > LP>> You ask a set of very good questions. > LP>> Troubleshooting is very much complicated by the intermittent qualities > LP>> of the problems. But each of the clients has issues that are mystifying. > LP>> > LP>> If the problem is client-side, you would expect that some client that > LP>> shares no code with the others would behave better. For this, I have > LP>> been experimenting with the iPhone clients: iOS AirPrint and Canon Print > LP>> for iPhone. When I tried that yesterday, the iOS "share" function did > LP>> not work: It lets me select the printer, then seemingly accepts the > LP>> printout, but nothing prints, and when I try again, the Canon is no > LP>> longer a selectable printer. But the Canon Print app works. > > On 2025-12-14, Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote: > NS> To make matters more complicated, there's always the chance one driver > NS> is confusing the device to the extent another driver cannot use it. > > For a while, my hypothesis was that the driver did not clear the > connection at the end of the print job. With a single-threaded > file-receive process in the printer, that would give almost these > results. But that is too simple an explanation, and if that were so, > powercycling the printer should clear it. It does not - reliably clear > it. Do these printers have a way to print directly from the printer from a USB flash drive or a memory card? If so, do they print normally when they're not usable through the network? Does the printer's own interface work normally when it's not usable through the network? > NS> Also, I suppose it's always possible this is caused by something in the > NS> driver that interacts with the printer even when it's not printing > NS> (e.g. some status query?), and so it's always possible such a Windows 11 > NS> system with the printer configured, but not in use, is enough to confuse > NS> the printer. > NS> > NS> (The joys of troubleshooting!) > > LP>> The Windows and Linux dvers have the same name, so they may have some > LP>> code shared. > >>> NS> Can any of the other systems be used as a printer server 24/7 (or at >>> NS> least when needed) to avoid printing directly from Windows 11? > > LP>> That is why the Linux system is in the mix. If it worked reliably, I > LP>> would have everybody else go through it. But it flakes out similarly to > LP>> the Windows systems. And Canon explicitly disclaims support for the > LP>> Linux driver, which is supplied "as a courtesy", but cannot be supported > LP>> due to the great variety of Linux distributions. > > NS> They're just making excuses. The same could be said of Windows, for > NS> example, at least as soon as you venture out of making just a driver, > NS> and start adding tools around it? > NS> > NS> Was the Linux driver also updated meanwhile, or it used to work before > NS> with no related software change in between? > > The Linux driver used to be quite reliable, but starting about a year > ago it became flaky, and I just told my users to use the direct spooler > on their Windows and Mac systems. So that may have been when the current > Linux driver came in with a Fedora version upgrade. > > NS> As much as I'd prefer Ethernet with 8P8C (or perhaps Wireless LAN as a > NS> fallback) as opposed to a connection to a computer, does the printer > NS> have that as an option you can use with the Linux system, connecting it > NS> directly to that computer over e.g. USB? > > The printer can connect via USB, Ethernet or WiFi, but only one at a > time. (Unlike my Epson inkjet at home.) And the Linux server system is > at the opposite end of our office suite. Another idea: checking the network status on the printer itself (p103 of the PDF that was linked in another post). Is it the same as when it's working normally? > And iOS AirPrint does not work > if the printer is not using WiFi. Good job, Apple. > NS> That way, it'd perhaps allow testing in a scenario where it'd be harder > NS> for other drivers to confuse the printer. (On top of that, for this you > NS> may want to temporarily try a Postscript driver when printing via IPP to > NS> CUPS from Windows, just in case there's also something in the generated > NS> printer content from the driver that is causing trouble.) > > That is a good suggestion, but a PosstScript driver needs a PPD > (PostScript Printer Definition) file for the printer, and I can't find > one for the newer Canon printers. For the CUPS interfacing the printer, yes. But I think for others, which hand off to CUPS, that won't be necessary, or at least it should be usable without a PPD? >>> NS> Another one: does the Windows 11 Canon driver have any configuration >>> NS> options? > > LP>> Not that I have found. You run the self-extracting install-kit, then > LP>> configure it with "Add Printer". Choice of letting Windows search for > LP>> it and auto configure it, or manually set it up as "IPP", "HTTP" or use > LP>> a designated TCP port. I have tried most variations there, but MS's > LP>> attempts to make it user friendly makes it hard to figure out what goes > LP>> wrong, when the setup times out, either in querying the printer for > LP>> information or when sending a test page. >> > NS> I'm thinking of stuff that'd be available both in printer settings (for > NS> defaults) and in advanced settings when printing. > NS> > NS> For example, "MS Publisher Color Printer" (available at least in NT > NS> 6.1), one of the Postscript drivers available with Windows, has a small > NS> number of Postscript options in the advanced settings. > NS> > NS> See [1] for screenshots of this, albeit these seem to be for a HP > NS> Laserjet driver. (Also, the first screenshot in that section shows > NS> another place where there might be settings?) > NS> > NS> [1] http://pig.made-it.com/printing.html#4936 > > Yes there used to be a "Generic Color PS Printer" available for Windows > in both the HP and MicroSoft section of Windows printer installation, > but I do not see them anymore. > > NS> No idea whether the Canon driver has anything like this, but it's worth > NS> checking it out, in case there's some option that could improve > NS> compatibility. > > That is why I was exloring the idea of a non-Canon Postscript driver. > > I have until the end of January to return the printer to BestBuy. > I am still hoping that I am overlooking something obvious because > of my feeling of panic. > > The alternative is to get a different brand of printer in the > same class - rated for 4000 pages per month. I am trying to stick with > Canon beacuse of a proven solid mechanical build quality (very few paper > jams). > I have been turned off by HP's forced subscription options, and swore > that I would never buy another one. > There is an Epson in a similar range (albeit a couple hundred dollars > more), but user reviews are very mixed. > > What else is there? I have heard very good things about Kyocera's > high-end systems, but I have never seen their mid-range units in > the wild. Ricoh used to be OK, but I have not seen them in years. > > There is a Xerox C325, but I also do not see that in stores. -- Nuno Silva
Back to comp.periphs.printers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Canon ImageClass Color MF663Cdw won't print Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-11 18:05 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-13 10:06 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-14 03:40 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-14 11:22 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-14 13:46 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-15 01:00 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print groenveld@acm.org (John D Groenveld) - 2025-12-15 14:21 +0000
Re: Canon ImageCLASS Color Lasers won't print Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-24 03:32 +0000
Re: Canon ImageClass Color MF663Cdw won't print TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-12-13 11:48 -0500
Re: Canon ImageClass Color MF663Cdw won't print groenveld@acm.org (John D Groenveld) - 2025-12-14 13:32 +0000
Re: Canon ImageClass Color MF663Cdw won't print Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-14 18:34 +0000
Re: Canon ImageClass Color MF663Cdw won't print groenveld@acm.org (John D Groenveld) - 2025-12-14 21:10 +0000
Re: Canon ImageClass Color MF663Cdw won't print Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-14 23:55 +0000
csiph-web