Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC?

From	"A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind>
Message-ID	<o8uYFJ3iqTdG-pn2-QrZVqIFUtMyL@localhost> (permalink)
Newsgroups	comp.os.os2.programmer.tools
Subject	Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC?
References	<Qg5I6Bo2seGy-pn2-BoDBOJfQGOmf@neurobox>
Organization	Xennanews
Date	2012-02-29 22:58 +0100

Show all headers | View raw

 > thus the focus on BASIC!

/**/;SAY "What?!"

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_BASIC

Please note that some environments, unlike GUIs like VisualAge for 
Basic's, are more attractive for beginners, because just an uncompiled
print "Hello, world!" is less hard to use. If I look at VisualAge for 
Basic, I see a form of some project, with matching difficult 
requirements. Does a first "Hello, world!" really require an OK 
button?  


--

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.tools | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

IBM VisualAge for BASIC? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-02-29 03:06 +0000
  Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2012-02-28 20:20 -0800
    Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-02-29 15:05 +0000
      Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? "Allan" <allan2@warpspeed.dyndns.dk> - 2016-03-03 03:12 +0200
        Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? "A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind> - 2016-03-04 09:57 +0100
  Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? Peter Brown <losepeteSPAM-ME-NOT@ntlworld.com> - 2012-02-29 11:22 +0000
    Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-02-29 21:54 +0000
  Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? "A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind> - 2012-02-29 22:58 +0100
  Re: IBM VisualAge for BASIC? Andreas Kohl <ak120@arcor.de> - 2016-03-01 21:25 +0100

csiph-web