Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.programmer.porting > #116
| From | Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.programmer.porting |
| Subject | Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem |
| Date | 2011-07-09 11:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnj1gf22.522.abuse@news.pr.network> (permalink) |
| References | <iv5rr7$dqt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4e176267$0$6545$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <slrnj1f34j.3nn.abuse@news.pr.network> <4e17b2e3$0$6555$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> |
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 03:46:10 +0200, Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> wrote: >> Strewth, you like typing don't you... >> >> return PAG_READ | (writable ? PAG_WRITE : 0) | (executable ? PAG_EXECUTE : >> 0); >> >> ... but why use 1 line when you can use 10, eh? > > It's all a matter of style. Sometimes, sometimes not. > In the end, most compilers will generate the same binary code from that. Possibly, possibly not. > At least if the optimizer is turned on. It depends on what you consider to > be better readable. Yes, a simple one liner like the above is perfectly readable and much more so than either of the examples quoted previously. > By the way: In a DO178B project people might rip your balls off if they see > "condensed" code like you have been writing. Fuck 'em. That isn't "condensed" code. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it. I see you didn't pick up on my little jibe about the pointless comments.
Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.porting | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2011-07-07 19:59 -0700
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Heiko Nitzsche <hn-expires-27nov11@arcor.de> - 2011-07-08 22:03 +0200
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Heiko Nitzsche <hn-expires-27nov11@arcor.de> - 2011-07-08 22:14 +0200
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 19:39 -0700
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 21:57 -0700
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2011-07-08 23:02 +0000
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem "Lars Erdmann" <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2011-07-09 03:46 +0200
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2011-07-09 11:32 +0000
Re: VirtualAlloc to DosAllocMem Paul Smedley <paulDESPAM@DESPAMMsmedley.id.au> - 2011-07-10 11:39 +0930
csiph-web